Legal Opinion

Ess v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment declaring that defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify plaintiff in an underlying personal injury action. That action arose out of a 1984 automobile accident that occurred near Anchorage, Alaska, while plaintiff was in Alaska for a youth hockey tournament. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was operating an automobile provided by the tournament hosts and rented from National Car Rental. The insurance policy covering the automobile was issued by a company that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Vermette v. Kenworth Truck Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Waterman v. Yamaha Motor Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Penn Iron & Metal Co. v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API