Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sfeir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to defendants, landlords of the premises where plaintiff was injured. There is no evidence that defendants exercised such supervision and control over the premises at the time plaintiff was injured so as to render them liable to plaintiff (see, Lashway v King, 179 AD2d 919, 921; Firpi v New York City Hous. Auth., 175 AD2d 858, 859-860, lv denied 78 NY2d 864; Cavanaugh v Knights of Columbus Council 4360, 142 AD2d 202, lv denied 74 NY2d 604). The grant of summary judgment was not premature;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. Knights of Columbus Council 4360Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Firpi v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Waterman v. Yamaha Motor Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Jessup v. HedbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Lashway v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Key Equity of N.Y., Inc. v. AzzamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API