Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 11, 2020No. 120246PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 120,246 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CURTIS L. COLEMAN JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. In postconviction sentence modification proceedings there must be a procedural vehicle for presenting an argument to the court. 2. The rule of law declared in Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99, 133 S. Ct. 2151,

186 L. Ed. 2d 314

(2013), that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires any fact which increases a sentence beyond the mandatory minimum must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt, cannot be…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. VonachenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  3. State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  4. State v. ApplebySupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API