State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 121,951 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. RONALD JOHNSON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. In postconviction sentence modification proceedings, there must be a procedural vehicle for presenting an argument to the court. 2. Applying State v. Coleman, 312 Kan. 114,
472 P.3d 85
(2020), to the circumstances of this case, there is no procedural vehicle that allows a court to revisit a sentence that was final when Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99, 133 S. Ct. 2151,
186 L. Ed. 2d 314
(2013), was decided. Appeal from Wyandotte District Court; JENNIFER L.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BedfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- Johnson (ID 79020) v. Wyandotte County District CourtDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
- Ronald Johnson v. Kansas Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026