Legal Opinion

Datesman v. Federal Life Ins.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided May 1, 1939No. 2275Published

1Opinion of the Court

Flood, J.,

This ease presents a problem of first impression in this State. It comes before us upon a rule for judgment on the pleadings.

Plaintiff brought suit as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy insuring the life of her son, who committed suicide. She asks for the face value of the policy. The policy was issued in 1928, and contains a two-year incontestability clause and a provision limiting defendant insurance company’s liability to the return of premiums if the insured should die by suicide within two years. The policy lapsed, but, pursuant to a reinstate*252ment clause, it was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. McCraySupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Morris v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Security Life Insurance Company v. LeeperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API