Legal Opinion

Sams v. Green

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1979No. 41078PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

This appeal, raising issues concerning the res ipsa loquitur doctrine and the measure of damages claimed, is complicated by the parties’ failure to agree upon the correctness of the recorded transcript under Rule 81.12(c).

The evidence at trial was that, as defendant-respondent drove her car down a hill, the car went off the roadway, crossed the sidewalk, and caused property damage to plaintiff. Defendant maintained her brakes suddenly failed and she went off of the roadway to avoid colliding with vehicles in front of her and injuring people. The jury’s verdict indicates it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harke v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. State v. HoopesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Hendershot v. MinichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Sands v. R. G. McKelvey Building Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Rahhal v. MossieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Karashin v. Haggard Hauling & Rigging, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Chilton v. GordenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Eckert v. DishonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Karashin v. Haggard Hauling & Rigging, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API