Legal Opinion

Eckert v. Dishon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1981No. WD 31529PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, presiding Judge.

This is an action for breach of implied warranty. The Judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Although appellants present several alleged errors, only one serves the purpose of the disposition of this appeal. The merits of the remaining arguments are neither reached nor passed upon. Appellants allege that the trial court erred in the submission of the verdict-directing instruction. (MAI 25.03 as modified.) They allege that no modification was necessary. In addition, they attack specific modifications which include: (a) in the first paragraph, the deletion of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yamnitz v. Polytech, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Sands v. R. G. McKelvey Building Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. O'DELL v. Custom Builders Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Matulunas v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Duren v. DoughertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jarrell v. Fort Worth Steel & Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Callicoat v. Acuff Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Lindsay v. McMilianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Ferguson v. Alfred Schroeder Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API