Legal Opinion

Foster v. Plock

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 17, 2017No. 16SC366PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colorado Supreme Court May 2017 Summaries of Selected Opinions May 15, 2017 2017 CO 39. No. 16SC366. Foster v. Plock. Claim Preclusion—Issue Preclusion—Mutuality. In this case, the Supreme Court considered whether mutuality is a necessary element of defensive claim preclusion. Although multiple divisions of the Court of Appeals have concluded that mutuality need not be established for the defensive use of claim preclusion, the Court disagrees. Instead, the Court concluded that mutuality is a necessary element of defensive claim preclusion. The Court also concluded that mutuality existed in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Foster v. PlockSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  2. Fitzgerald v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  3. Colorado Department of Revenue v. Creager Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. Montoya v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  5. Samuel J. Stoorman & Associates, P.C. v. DixonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Villas at Highland Park Homeowners Ass'n v. Villas at Highland Park, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  2. Gale v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  3. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  4. Grays v. Granicus, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
  5. In re Villas at Highland Park Homeowners Ass'n v. Villas at Highland Park, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API