Legal Opinion

Everitt v. Laspeyre

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1943No. 14396PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

Whenever a question arises as to the proper construction to be given to a clause in a will, the thing to be determined is, what did the testator intend? The problem is not usually aided by a study in etymology, nor is it always safe to turn the inquiry into a quest to discover the precise meaning of a word according to scholarly standards, or to ascertain what would be accepted by accomplished grammarians as the correct parsing of a sentence. Courts should not neglect to drink deep at the Pierian spring when aid from such a source may be had; but applying the cardinal rule in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Clay v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. State v. StudebakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Comer v. ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Menominee River Boom Co. v. Augustus Spies Lumber & Cedar Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Yarbrough v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Bradford v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. United Benefit Life &C. Ins. Co. v. GlissonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Brody v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API