Everitt v. Laspeyre
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
Whenever a question arises as to the proper construction to be given to a clause in a will, the thing to be determined is, what did the testator intend? The problem is not usually aided by a study in etymology, nor is it always safe to turn the inquiry into a quest to discover the precise meaning of a word according to scholarly standards, or to ascertain what would be accepted by accomplished grammarians as the correct parsing of a sentence. Courts should not neglect to drink deep at the Pierian spring when aid from such a source may be had; but applying the cardinal rule in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Clay v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- State v. StudebakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Comer v. ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Menominee River Boom Co. v. Augustus Spies Lumber & Cedar Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Yarbrough v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Bradford v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- United Benefit Life &C. Ins. Co. v. GlissonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Brody v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.