Legal Opinion

Brody v. Long

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1961PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The first order appealed from is that denying the application of persons not parties to the action to intervene. Such order is not an appealable order in so far as the defendants are concerned. Although with respect to the moving parties it is “a final order affecting a substantial right made in special proceedings” within the meaning of sec. 274.33 (2), Stats., this is not true as to the defendants. State v. McDonald Lumber Co. (1960), 9 Wis. (2d) 206, 100 N. W. (2d) 701. This is because a party to the action, who is aggrieved by such an order, can secure a review thereof by appealing from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Menominee River Boom Co. v. Augustus Spies Lumber & Cedar Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Everitt v. LaspeyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Doherty v. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Kidder v. PueschnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Orton v. NoonanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Chippewa Cable Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Love v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Borek Cranberry Marsh, Inc. v. Jackson CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Chmill v. Friendly Ford-Mercury of Janesville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  5. Saletri v. ClarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API