Legal Opinion
United Benefit Life &C. Ins. Co. v. Glisson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 9, 1961No. 38973PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
Defendant contends that the plaintiff’s petition does not state a cause of action because of the following provision of the policy: “The provisions of this policy relating to benefits, other than life insurance benefits, do not cover (a) accidental bodily injuries arising out of or in the course of the employment of the protected person or his dependents or sickness covered by a Workmen’s Compensation Act or similar legislation. . .”
The defendant contends that it is not obligated to pay the plaintiff for hospital and medical expenses incurred by him as a result of injuries to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clay v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Everitt v. LaspeyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Whitaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. FrazerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Prudential Insurance v. ChestnutCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by16 opinions
- Float-Away Door Company and National Surety Company v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Crawford v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Montoya v. Travelers InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. BellarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Segelstrom v. Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.