Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Lord

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 29, 1954No. Gen. 46,231, 46,232PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Niemeyer

The City of Chicago, plaintiff, appeals from judgments in favor of the defendant in separate actions wherein the respective defendants, Lord and Chertkoff, were charged with unlawfully exhibiting for gain or profit in a place of amusement open to the general public, pictures containing obscene, lewd, indecent or immoral matter in violation of section 13, chapter 192, Municipal Code of Chicago. Reference is made in plaintiff’s brief to a further charge against each defendant in violating section 9 of chapter 192, which prohibits the exhibition of indecent, immoral or lewd pictures or plays.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Lees v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. The People v. MayoIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. City of Chicago v. BergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. City of Chicago v. LordIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Powers v. KelleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. Hoban v. RochfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API