Legal Opinion

Haas v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1942No. L. A. 18389PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

— This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel payment of a pension to petitioner as a member of the Los Angeles Fire Department. After a hearing on the merits, petitioner secured judgment directing the issuance of a per emptory writ of mandate and from this judgment defendants appealed.

Substantially the same problem, arising under the same city charter provisions, was presented and determined in the case of McKeag v. Board of Pension Commrs., ante, p. 386 [132 P.2d 198] (this day decided). In that case we held that it can properly be determined upon mandate proceedings whether the requirements…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKeag v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Pinion v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Carrick v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. WarrenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Turner v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. Knoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Kreutzer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API