Legal Opinion

Carrick v. Sherman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1930No. Docket No. 6921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McKENZIE, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment of mandate ordering the defendants to desist from deducting from the pay-roll furnished the city auditor any portion of petitioners’ wages, which deductions are retained by the city for the purpose of maintaining San Francisco City Employees’ Retirement System, which was established by ordinance in 1922. The ordinance provides that all employees of the city, with certain exceptions, must belong to this protective system. Included within one of the exceptions are firemen who are entitled to the benefits of firemen’s relief and pension…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hurley v. SykesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Burke v. EdgarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haas v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API