Legal Opinion
Pipkin v. Acumen
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided July 30, 2020No. 20190378-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2020 UT App 111
THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LYNDA PIPKIN, JANICE LEGLER, BENJAMIN THOMPSON, ROBERT MCENTEE, ELIZABETH CARLIN, ARTURO MORALES LLAN, AND PAUL COZZENS, Appellants, v. DARYL ACUMEN, Appellee. Opinion No. 20190378-CA Filed July 30, 2020 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable David M. Connors No. 180700948 Seth D. Needs, Attorney for Appellants Todd D. Weiler, Attorney for Appellee JUDGE GREGORY K. ORME authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER and RYAN M. HARRIS concurred. ORME, Judge: ¶1 During the period relevant to this lawsuit,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Cox v. HatchUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Jacob v. BezzantUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Wayment v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mathews v. McCownUtah Supreme Court · 2025
- Equine Holdings v. Auburn WoodsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Hatfield v. Cottages on 78th Community Association, TheDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- M.N.V. Holdings v. 200 SouthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Shanley v. HutchingsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024