Legal Opinion

Mitchell Irr. Dist. v. Sharp

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1941No. 2240PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit by The Mitchell Irrigation District, a corporation organized under the laws of Nebraska, hereinafter called plaintiff, against Seymour S. Sharp, Superintendent of Water Division No. 1, and John A. Whiting, Jr., Water Commissioner of District No. 14, Division No. 1, of the State of Wyoming, hereinafter called defendants. The complaint alleged that plaintiff is an irrigation district comprising about 14,000 acres of land in Nebraska; that it owns an adjudicated water right acquired in compliance with the laws of Wyoming with date of priority of June 20,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Louisiana v. JumelSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Hagood v. SouthernSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Worcester County Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Cunningham v. MacOn & Brunswick R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Day v. ArmstrongWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Broadwater-Missouri Water Users' Ass'n v. Montana Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  3. State by and Through Christopulos v. Husky Oil CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State by and Through Christopulos v. Husky Oil CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API