Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 2003No. ED 82427PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., Judge.

Plaintiffs, Charles Bailey and Virgie Bailey (hereinafter referred to jointly as “Bailey”), brought an action against defendant, Cameron Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter “Cameron”) 1 for loss sustained in a fire. Bailey’s petition was in four counts: civil conspiracy, fraud, breach of contract, and vexatious refusal to pay. Bailey appeals from the trial court’s judgment which dismissed with prejudice his fraud count and which, pursuant to a jury verdict, found in favor of Cameron on the breach of contract and vexatious refusal counts. He also appeals from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Hancock v. ShookSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. Lasky v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. State v. PaglinoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Nettie's Flower Garden, Inc. v. Sis, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whitnell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. McGuire v. SeltsamSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  3. Brown v. BennettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. March v. Midwest St. Louis, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Roth v. RothMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API