Legal Opinion
Roth v. Roth
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 22, 2005No. ED 85622PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARY K. HOFF, Presiding Judge.
David Roth (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment after a jury verdict found him hable to Frank Roth III (Plaintiff) for payment of $20,000 on a promissory note. We reverse and remand to the trial court for a new trial. 1
Facts
On May 11, 1992, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a promissory note whereby Defendant agreed to pay Plaintiff $27,859.56 plus interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum. The amount was secured by Defendant’s grant of a lien to Plaintiff on certain vehicles, equipment, machinery, tools, and inventory belonging to Defendant’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mobley v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Cass Bank & Trust Co. v. MestmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bailey v. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by4 opinions
- Echols v. City of RiversideMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Devin Woods v. Carl WareMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- J.M. v. Lee's Summit Sch. Dist. & Douglas DemarcoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Curl v. BNSF Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017