Legal Opinion

Bacher v. Krauss

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 23, 1934No. 32319PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

Plaintiff, who is a judgment creditor of Leopold Krauss in a sum exceeding $10,000, seized by garnishment under fieri facias four negotiable bonds in the hands of the Whitney Trust & Savings Bank; the bonds being the property of said Leopold Krauss. The bonds had been placed in the bank by Leon Heyman, who was also made a party garnishee. The bank answered that the bonds had been placed in its hands by Heyman, who claimed that he held them in pledge. Heyman answered, admitting that the bonds belonged to Krauss, but alleged that he held them in pledge for a debt due him by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lhote & Co. v. Church Extension Soc. of Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Tremont Lumber Co. v. TalbotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  3. Cousin v. St. Tammany Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  4. Lafayette Realty Co. v. PoerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. Landry v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nunez v. BaynardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. Vogt v. JannarelliSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Copellar v. BrittLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Hunt v. ChisholmLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API