Copellar v. Britt
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Judge.
The allegations of plaintiff’s petition are substantially as hereinafter paraphrased. They are inconsistent with one another in several particulars, as will be noticed, and as a whole are somewhat vague and indefinite. This condition has caused us considerable trouble in our study of the case.
Plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land in Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana, with certain buildings and improvements thereon, which contains approximately 600 acres and is used as a game preserve and pleasure resort. The entire property was rented by her on June IS, 1937, to one C. E.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McGee v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Lhote & Co. v. Church Extension Soc. of Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Mavor v. ArmantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
- Courtney v. Louisiana Ry. & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Hodge v. Monroe Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.