Legal Opinion
Bahr v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 12, 2016No. 14-72327PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge CLIFTON
*1222OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Sandra Bahr and David Matusow petition for review of a final rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approving Arizona’s Five Percent Plan for airborne particulate matter around Mari-copa County. They argue that the EPA erred in approving this plan because it did not include best available control measures (BACM) and most stringent control measures (MSM) as of 2012. The petitioners also argue that the EPA failed to follow its own published guidance in approving Arizona’s claim that 135…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Upper Missouri Waterkeeper v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency & Scott PruittDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2019
- Sierra Club v. EPACourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Yazzie v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Sierra Club v. EPACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Advanced Integrative Medical Science Institute, Pllc v. United States Drug Enforcement AdminCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.