Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. The Tug M/V Bayou Lacombe

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1979No. 77-1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

This appeal raises the question whether a railroad company has a cause of action enforceable in admiralty for damages for the loss of use of a bridge negligently struck by a vessel.

On the morning of March 18, 1975, the tugboat M/V Bayou Lacombe struck a swingspan railroad bridge crossing the Tennessee River at Decatur, Alabama. The Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co., forced to reroute its trains until repairs to the bridge were completed, sued under the Admiralty Extension Act, 46 U.S.C. § 740, to recover damages for the loss of the use of the bridge. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Thompson v. Texas Mexican Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Louisville And Nashville Railroad Co. v. The Tug M/V Bayou LacombeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API