Herlihy v. Civil Service Commission
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.
This case requires us to construe the Commonwealth’s civil service law as it defines “departmental unit” for purposes of replacing less senior employees (a practice commonly known as “bumping”) when budgetary constraints so require. During the spring of 1994, the director of the Department of Mental Health’s (department) southeastern area decided to eliminate all twelve psychologist II and HI positions at the Pocasset Mental Health Center at Bourne (center). As none, of *836the persons holding these positions was generating income from third-party payors, a decision was made to ehminate the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Protective Life Insurance v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Raytheon Co. v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- City of Gloucester v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Debnam v. Town of BelmontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Andrews v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Ballotte v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- City of Boston v. Salaried Employees of North America, Local 9158Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Service Employees International Union, Local 509 v. Auditor of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016