Legal Opinion

Carter-Beveridge Drilling Co., Inc. v. J. Willis Hughes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 16, 1963No. 20264_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Contrary to appellant’s position, we hold that the venue provisions of 28 U.S. C. § 1391(c) are not applicable to corporations suing as plaintiffs. The effect of the statute is that a corporation may be sued in any judicial district in which it is incorporated or licensed to do business or is doing business, and such defendant corporation is considered a resident of the judicial district for venue purposes. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(c); Robert E. Lee & Co., Inc. v. Veatch, 301 F.2d 434 (C.A. 4, 1961), cert. denied 371 U.S. 813, 83 5. Ct. 23, 9 L.Ed.2d 55 (1962).

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robert E. Lee & Co. v. VeatchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Manchester Modes, Inc. v. Adolph P. SchumanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  2. Handlos v. Litton Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
  3. City of Burbank v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Upjohn Company v. FinchDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1969
  5. American Cyanamid Co. v. Hammond Lead Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API