Carter-Beveridge Drilling Co., Inc. v. J. Willis Hughes
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Contrary to appellant’s position, we hold that the venue provisions of 28 U.S. C. § 1391(c) are not applicable to corporations suing as plaintiffs. The effect of the statute is that a corporation may be sued in any judicial district in which it is incorporated or licensed to do business or is doing business, and such defendant corporation is considered a resident of the judicial district for venue purposes. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(c); Robert E. Lee & Co., Inc. v. Veatch, 301 F.2d 434 (C.A. 4, 1961), cert. denied 371 U.S. 813, 83 5. Ct. 23, 9 L.Ed.2d 55 (1962).
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Robert E. Lee & Co. v. VeatchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
3Cited by26 opinions
- Manchester Modes, Inc. v. Adolph P. SchumanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Handlos v. Litton Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
- City of Burbank v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Upjohn Company v. FinchDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1969
- American Cyanamid Co. v. Hammond Lead Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.