Legal Opinion
Lillian Roberts Dir. of Dist. Council 37, Afscme ex rel. Situated v. Cuomo
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided September 24, 2018No. 1:12-CV-0046 (MAD/CFH)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION1
In a complaint dated January 10, 2012, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants unilaterally *44increased the percentage of contributions that Plaintiffs, active and retired employees, are required to pay for health insurance benefits in retirement and, thereby, violated the Contracts and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution, impaired Plaintiffs' contractual rights under the terms of their Collective Bargaining Agreement, and violated state law. See Dkt. No. 1.
Currently before the Court is Defendants' motion for summary judgment.
II.…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fitch v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022