Fitch v. State of Maryland
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND KENNETH FITCH, etal., : Plaintiffs, : Vo * Civil No. PJM 18-2817 STATE OF MARYLAND, e¢ ai. Defendants. * MEMORANDUM OPINION _ This case concerns the State of Maryland’s subsidized prescription drug benefit program provided to certain retired and current State employees and the State’s attempt to mandate transition of those retirees and employees to Part D of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003,
Pub. L. No. 108-173, 117
Stat. 2066 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1395w-101 ef seg. (Part D”)). In the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- James R. Ahrenholz, Plaintiff-Appellee/respondent v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Defendant-Appellant/petitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Tom L. Ashlock v. Conseco Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.