Legal Opinion
Matter of Suazo
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1994No. 21165PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
877 P.2d 1088 (1994)
117 N.M. 784
In the Matter of the Administrative Revocation Hearing of Abel G. SUAZO.
STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Petitioner,
v.
Abel G. SUAZO, Defendant-Respondent.
No. 21165.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
June 23, 1994.
Tom Udall, Atty. Gen. and Bruce J. Fort, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Taxation and Revenue Dept., Santa Fe, for petitioner.
Carlos F. Vigil, Santa Fe, for respondent.
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
The New Mexico Implied Consent Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 66-8-105 through 66-8-112 (Repl.Pamp.1987 & Cum.Supp.1993), provides that a motorist, upon refusing to take a blood-alcohol…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Lund v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Department of Licensing v. LaxWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Mills v. New Mexico State Board of Psychologist ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997