Legal Opinion

Darlington Brick & Clay Products Co. v. Aino

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1973No. Appeal, No. 30PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

The issue in this appeal is whether appellant entered into certain contracts as an individual or as an agent for a corporation. The lower court found the appellant personally liable, and we affirm.

This action was brought to recover the purchase price of certain bricks sold by appellee. The case was first tried before a board of arbitrators which found for appellee. On appeal, the case was tried before Judge Loran L. Lewis without a jury who also found for the appellee. Appellant filed exceptions which were dismissed by a court en banc and judgment was entered for appellee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Krobot v. GanzakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Weimer v. BockelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Wheatcroft v. Albert Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Bozitsko v. HoffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Courts v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Bachman v. ArtingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. J. W. Goodliffe & Son v. OdzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Publicker Industries, Inc. And Continental Distilling Corporation v. Roman Ceramics Corporation, Publicker Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Stowe v. BookerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API