Legal Opinion

Bachman v. Artinger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1981No. 4PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

In accordance with the adage that “every dog has its day,” we are called upon in this appeal to resolve a dispute concerning man’s best friend. On April 20, 1976, appellant, Doris Bachman, purchased a miniature schnauzer puppy from appellee, Ruth Artinger, trading as Crafton Kennels. The purchase price was $165.00. On April 19,1977 appellant commenced the instant action in trespass, alleging that appellee had fraudulently misrepresented that the puppy was in good physical health at the time of the sale and also that the puppy was a pedigreed dog registrable with the American…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. BAKER v. RANGOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Leibowitz v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. McMahon v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Community Legal Services Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. American Future System, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Eastern PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Robert Wooler Co. v. Fidelity BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Bonavitacola v. CluverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. School District v. Maryland Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API