Legal Opinion
Hanlon v. Berger
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 24, 1999No. 97-1927Published
1Opinion of the Court
526 U.S. 808 (1999)
HANLON et al.
v.
BERGER et ux.
No. 97-1927.
United States Supreme Court.
Argued March 24, 1999.
Decided May 24, 1999.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Richard A. Cordray argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was James A. Anzelmo.
Henry H. Rossbacher argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief for respondents Berger et al. were Nanci E. Nishimura and Jay F. Lansing. P. Cameron DeVore, Jessica L. Goldman, and David C. Kohler filed briefs for respondents Cable News Network, Inc., et al.[*]
2Per curiam
Respondents Paul and Erma…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hanlon v. BergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Paul W. Berger and Erma R. Berger v. Rodney C. Hanlon Joel Scrafford Richard C. Branzell Robert Prieksat Kris A. McLean Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., a Georgia Corporation Robert Rainey Donald Hooper United States of America, Paul W. Berger and Erma R. Berger v. Jack Hamann Cable News Network, Inc., a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997