Legal Opinion
Hanlon v. Berger
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 24, 1999No. 97-1927PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondents Paul and Erma Berger sued petitioners— special agents of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and an assistant United States attorney — for damages under Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U. S. 388 (1971). They alleged that the conduct of petitioners had violated their rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 129 F. 3d 505 (CA9 1997). We granted certiorari, 525 U. S. 981 (1998).
Respondents live on a 75,000-acre ranch near Jordan, Montana. In 1993, a Magistrate Judge issued a warrant authorizing the search of “The Paul W. Berger…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Paul W. Berger and Erma R. Berger v. Rodney C. Hanlon Joel Scrafford Richard C. Branzell Robert Prieksat Kris A. McLean Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., a Georgia Corporation Robert Rainey Donald Hooper United States of America, Paul W. Berger and Erma R. Berger v. Jack Hamann Cable News Network, Inc., a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by34 opinions
- Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Anderson v. SuitersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Villegas v. Gilroy Garlic Festival Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Brunette v. Humane Society Of Ventura CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.