Legal Opinion

Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library

District Court, D. Montana

Decided March 6, 2012No. CV 11-64-M-DWM-JCLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge.

September 28, 2011, Defendant Lee Enterprises, Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment on the counts remaining against it in this matter. United States Magistrate Judge Lynch entered Findings and Recommendations on November 30, 2011, 2011 WL 7462038 (dkt # 181). Both Lee Enterprises and Plaintiff Michael E. Spreadbury filed objections. They are therefore entitled to de novo review of the specified findings or recommendations to which they object. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Because the parties are familiar with the facts, they will not be restated here except…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Andrea Dworkin Priscilla Moree Judith Fouts v. Hustler Magazine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Toys "R" Us-Delaware, Inc.—Fair & Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
  2. Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public LibraryDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2012
  3. Jonas v. Lake County LeaderDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API