Legal Opinion

In re Toys "R" Us-Delaware, Inc.—Fair & Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) Litigation

District Court, C.D. California

Decided January 11, 2013No. Nos. MDL 08-01980 MMM (FMOx), CV 06-08163 MMM (FMOx), CV 08-06645 MMM (FMOx)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO CERTIFY CLASSES

MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

On December 21, 2006, plaintiffs Nicola Edwards and James Schley filed an action in this court against defendant Toys “R” Us (“Toys”), alleging that it had violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.1 Specifically, plaintiffs asserted that Toys had violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FAC-TA”), which requires that “no person that accepts credit cards or debit cards for the transaction of business shall print more than the last five digits of the card number…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aguirre v. Amscan Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. ELLEN BASKIN VS. P.C. RICHARD & SON, LLC (L-0911-18, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  3. Ellen Baskin v. P.C. Richard & Son, LLC (084257) (Ocean County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021
  4. Jammeh v. HNN Associates LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  5. Nichols v. Geico Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API