Legal Opinion

Redmon v. Cuneo Consulting, et al.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided April 13, 2026No. 2:25-cv-03151Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION REDMON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:25-cv-03151-BCL-cgc ) CUNEO CONSULTING, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand. Defendant Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company (“CFSIC”) filed a Memorandum in Opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion for Remand is DENIED. BACKGROUND This matter arises from a July 22, 2024, shooting in Memphis, Tennessee, where security guard Richard Lewis shot and killed his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, a Michigan and Indiana Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. Northland Insurance Company v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Cailu Title Corporation, Donald G. Sare, Jr., and Kelly L. SareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API