Legal Opinion

Washington Public Trust Advocates ex rel. City of Spokane v. City of Spokane

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 20, 2003No. 21711-6-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

In connection with the downtown Spokane River Park Square parking improvements, Washington Public Trust Advocates (WPTA) brought a “taxpayers’ derivative action,” naming both the city of Spokane and the Spokane Parking Public Development Authority (SPPDA) as plaintiffs without their consent. The trial court dismissed the suit under CR 12(b)(6), concluding no legal basis existed in Washington for a citizen to file an unauthorized complaint in the name of a governmental entity. WPTA appealed. We affirm.

FACTS

In the 1990s, the City and property owners of the River Park Square Mall designed plans…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crampton v. ZabriskieSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Tacoma v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Crampton v. ZabriskieSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Robinson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Friends of North Spokane County Parks v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Downey v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Friends of North Spokane County Parks v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API