Legal Opinion
Downey v. Pierce County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 29, 2011No. 41055-9-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohanson, J.
¶1 Heidi I. Downey appeals a summary judgment order (1) affirming a hearing examiner’s decision finding that her dog is a dangerous animal under Pierce County Code (PCC) 6.07.0151 and (2) dismissing her Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act (UDJA)2/taxpayers’ derivative action3 challenging Pierce County’s (County) dan*156gerous animal declaration (DAD) proceedings. In regard to her UDJA/taxpayers’ derivative claims, she argues that the County’s DAD process is facially unconstitutional because (1) it requires the person challenging a DAD to pay a fee to obtain an evidentiary hearing and further review,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Didlake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Morrison v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Personal Restraint Petition Of: David Allen Jr. TroupeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Johnson v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In Re The Detention Of: Jack Leck IiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013