Legal Opinion

(PC) Booth v. Santos

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 24, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00509Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICK J. BOOTH, No. 2:23-cv-0509 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DAWN SANTOS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302. 19 Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As plaintiff has submitted a 20 declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his request will be granted. 21 Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. NewellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API