Legal Opinion · Dissent

Klingenberg v. . Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1DissentClarkson, J.

This is an action instituted by the plaintiff for the recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained by her as a result of being thrown from the seat of an automobile in which she was riding as a guest along North Person Street in the city of Raleigh. At the intersection of North Person Street and East Jones Street plaintiff was thrown from the rear seat of an automobile when it struck a valley gutter constructed at said intersection. As a result thereof she sustained serious injury.

When North Person Street was paved said valley gutter was constructed across said street at the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brinkmeyer v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Hill v. . Board of Aldermen of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  3. Dargan v. Mayor of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  4. City of Richmond v. Virginia Bonded Warehouse Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  5. Claussen v. City of LuverneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Montel Lavelle HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Sanders v. . SmithfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Sanders v. Town of SmithfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Fanning v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hunt v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API