Legal Opinion

Micek v. Omaha Steel Works

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1939No. 30479PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnsen, J.

The previous opinion in this case is reported in 135 Neb, 449, 282 N. W. 262. Argument was allowed on the motion for rehearing, and various members of the bar have filed briefs as amici curiæ.

Criticism is made of our decision, on the ground that it awards compensation for total permanent disability to a workman who has. demonstrated that he is still possessed of a substantial and continuing earning power in other employment.

Without repeating all the facts, it will be recalled that plaintiff suffered a fracture of his first lumbar vertebra, with accompanying nerve injuries. In consequence, his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Brown-McDonald Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Johnson v. David Cole Creamery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Wingate v. Evans Model LaundryNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Drum v. Omaha Steel WorksNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Epsten v. Hancock-Epsten Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CowgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Sidel v. Travelers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Elliott v. Gooch Feed Mill Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. SteelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Mulder v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API