Legal Opinion

Epsten v. Hancock-Epsten Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1917No. 20084PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: George A. Day, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action to recover compensation for an injury sustained by plaintiff April 29, 1915, while in the employ of defendant. In operating a press, plaintiff placed his left foot under the plunger, which crushed his great toe. Medical attention was promptly furnished by defendant. Plaintiff returned to his employment May 18, 1915, and worked until May 26, 1915, when blood poisoning developed. He then went to a hospital, where his injured toe was amputated at the second joint. In the fall of that year he attended a business college, returning to work in defendant’s office May 20, 1916. At…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johansen v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CowgerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hull v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Johnson v. David Cole Creamery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Ludwickson v. Central States Electric Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Micek v. Omaha Steel WorksNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API