Legal Opinion

City of Bremerton v. Spears

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1998No. 64336-9PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

Two issues are before us in this case. The State asks us to clarify whether the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction in cases involving review of civil traffic infractions involving small fines. John Spears and the State ask us to decide whether the mandatory motorcycle helmet statute, as implemented by the current administrative rule defining helmets, is constitutional. We hold that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction, and that there is no constitutional defect in the regulation implementing the mandatory helmet law.

FACTS

John Spears was cited for traffic infractions on five…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Limstrom v. LadenburgWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. RichWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. MorenoWashington Supreme Court · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API