Legal Opinion
Boon v. Professional Collection Consultants
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 31, 2014No. Case No. 12-CV-03081-H (WMC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:(1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; and(2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE AS MOOT
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge.
On November 16, 2013, Plaintiff Mark Boon (“Plaintiff’ or “Boon”) filed a third amended complaint (“TAC”) against Defendant Professional Collection Consultants (“Defendant” or “PCC”). (Doc. No. 24.) On December 9, 2013, PCC filed a motion to dismiss Boon’s TAC pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or in the alternative for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (Doc. No. 26.) PCC’s motion also requests that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prof'l Collection Consultants v. Lujan, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Nyberg v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LujanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LujanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018