Legal Opinion

Houts v. Kare-Mor, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1993No. 92-140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Appellant General Insurance Company of America appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court finding that respondent Pamela J. Houts’ current medical condition, resulting from surgery on April 11, 1988, stemmed from her April 4, 1988, industrial injury.

We affirm.

General Insurance presents two issues for review. Houts believes that the two issues can be combined into one. We will review the following issues:

1. Is there substantial evidence to support the Workers’ Compensation Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law?

2. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in finding that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roadarmel v. Acme Concrete Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Laber v. Skaggs Alpha BetaMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hall v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Selley v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Reeverts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Stevens v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Larson v. Barry Smith Logging, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Stevens v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API