Legal Opinion

Stevens v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1994No. 94-004 and 94-005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a Workers’ Compensation Court order concluding that the claimant did not fraudulently obtain workers’ compensation benefits from the State Fund. The Workers’ Compensation Court also concluded that the insurer was not unreasonable in its investigation and termination of the claimant’s benefits. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

We restate the following issues on appeal and cross-appeal:

APPEAL

I. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in determining that the claimant, Patrick Stevens (Stevens) was not entitled to a 20 percent penalty fee…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stordalen v. Ricci's Food FarmMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lovell v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Dean v. Austin Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Roseneau Foods, Inc. v. ColemanMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Wood v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. S.L.H. v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Kloepfer v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Marcott v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Kloepfer v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Marcott v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API