Legal Opinion

Hall v. Atlantic Richfield Company

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1991No. 90-562PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

Sam R. Hall appeals from the judgment of the Montana Workers’ Compensation Court entered September 7,1990, denying him medical benefits, attorney’s fees, costs, and penalties. We affirm.

Hall presents the following issues:

1. Does substantial evidence support the conclusion of the Workers’ Compensation Court that Atlantic Richfield Co. (ARCO) is not responsible for Hall’s medical bills?

2. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err by not finding claimant temporarily totally disabled or “presently” permanently totally disabled?

Summary of Facts

Sam R. Hall, age 38, has a long history of injuries…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dumont v. Wickens Bros. Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wood v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. O'BRIEN v. Central FeedsMontana Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Houts v. Kare-Mor, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Garcia v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Garcia v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API