Legal Opinion
Currie v. United States
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided June 30, 1986No. Civ. No. C-85-629-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GORDON, Senior District Judge:
Defendant has moved to amend its answer to paragraph 28 of plaintiff’s complaint. Paragraph 28 states as follows:
*57Leonard Avery was at all times set out hereinabove a Vietnam veteran of the United States Army, qualified and eligible for treatment and care by the Veterans Administration. By reason of such relationship, the Veterans Administration, and its staff and employees, including [various doctors], had the affirmative duty to render proper medical treatment and care' to Avery upon presentment of the veteran at the VA Hospital in Durham,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 442, 29 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,851, 10 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1410 Curtis Jackson, W. C. McClendon Lige Scretchen, Nathaniel Cooper and W. E. Parker, Cross-Appellants v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada, Cross-Appellee. Curtis Jackson, W. C. McClendon Lige Scretchen v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, Co., Brotherhood Railway Carmen of the United States and CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Jerry A. Beeck and Judy A. Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Earl E. Komie v. Buehler Corporation, an Indiana Corporation, Buehler Corporation and James BechtelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Williams v. KriegerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001
- McCONKIE v. NicholsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005