Legal Opinion

The People v. Curtis Smith

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1969No. 41643PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood

Curtis Smith filed a pro se petition in the circuit court of Cook County pursuant to the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1965, ch. 38, art. 122) alleging certain infirmities in his convictions upon pleas of guilty to 6 indictments charging him with 2 rapes, 2 robberies and 2 assaults with intent to commit rape. The State’s motion to dismiss that petition was allowed, and the case appealed here. We reversed and remanded (People v. Smith, 37 Ill.2d 622) for a new hearing in order that petitioner might be represented by counsel other than the public defender (petitioner had alleged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The People v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. The PEOPLE v. AshleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. The PEOPLE v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. The People v. NashIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  5. City of Chicago v. JoyceIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. SpicerIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. The PEOPLE v. GainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. CrislipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API