Legal Opinion

The PEOPLE v. Smith

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1967No. 39790PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kluczynski

Petitioner, Curtis Smith, filed a pro se petition in the circuit court of Cook County for a hearing under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1965, chap. 38, art. 122) to review his conviction upon pleas of guilty to indictments charging him with rape, robbery, and assault with intent to commit rape. The trial court sustained the State’s motion to dismiss the petition and the cause is now before us on direct appeal from that dismissal.

Since it is our opinion that this cause be reversed and remanded for a new hearing, the following are the only facts and allegations we need set…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. AshleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  2. The PEOPLE v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Angarano v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Angarano v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. BanksIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API