Legal Opinion
Rotec Industries, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corp.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided January 4, 2002No. 99-2080PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McCUSKEY, District Judge.
On April 12,1999, Plaintiff, Rotee Industries, Inc., filed its Complaint (# 1) against Defendants, Mitsubishi Corporation (MC), Mitsubishi International Corporation (MIC), Tucker Associates, Inc. and Garry Tucker (collectively referred to as “Tucker”). This case is now before the court for ruling on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 39). Following this court’s careful and thorough review of the documents submitted by the parties and the arguments of the parties, Defendants’ Motion (# 39) is GRANTED.
FACTS 1
This action concerns the Three Gorges Dam Project…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Pepsico, Inc., a Corporation v. William E. Redmond, Jr., and the Quaker Oats Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Rotec Industries, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corporation, Tucker Associates, Inc. And Garry Tucker, and Mitsubishi International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hauck Manufacturing Co. v. Astec Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Lafarge North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- First Financial Bank, N.A. v. BauknechtDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2014
- Unisource Worldwide, Inc. v. SwopeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Destiny Health, Inc. v. Connecticut General Life Insurance CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015