Legal Opinion

Haas v. Hayslip

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1977No. 77-82PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented for review is whether governmental immunity from tort liability is still available as a defense for political subdivisions of the state in view of the recent enactment by the G-eneral Assembly of the Court of Claims Act, R. C. 2743.01 et seq.

Except as otherwise provided by statute, municipal corporations are immune from liability in the performance of their governmental functions. See, e. g., Broughton v. Cleveland (1957), 167 Ohio St. 29. Since 1854, however, this court has consistently held that, oven absent statutory authorization, the defense of immunity is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Gabris v. BlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Sears v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Hyde v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Butler v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Schenkolewski v. Cleveland Metroparks SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. McCloud v. NimmerOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API